The NY Times – Praising the tolerance of infidelity if it benefits liberal political causes?

There aren’t enough “Headdesks” in the world to cover this:

MY WIFE’S LOVER

My wife is having an affair with a government executive. His role is to manage a project whose progress is seen worldwide as a demonstration of American leadership. (This might seem hyperbolic, but it is not an exaggeration.) I have met with him on several occasions, and he has been gracious. (I doubt if he is aware of my knowledge.) I have watched the affair intensify over the last year, and I have also benefited from his generosity. He is engaged in work that I am passionate about and is absolutely the right person for the job. I strongly feel that exposing the affair will create a major distraction that would adversely impact the success of an important effort. My issue: Should I acknowledge this affair and finally force closure? Should I suffer in silence for the next year or two for a project I feel must succeed? Should I be “true to my heart” and walk away from the entire miserable situation and put the episode behind me?

NAME WITHHELD

The response from “The Ethicist”?

Prepare yourself [my emphasis below]…

Don’t expose the affair in any high-profile way. It would be different if this man’s project was promoting some (contextually hypocritical) family-values platform, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. The only motive for exposing the relationship would be to humiliate him and your wife, and that’s never a good reason for doing anything. This is between you and your spouse. You should tell her you want to separate, just as you would if she were sleeping with the mailman. The idea of “suffering in silence” for the good of the project is illogical. How would the quiet divorce of this man’s mistress hurt an international leadership initiative? He’d probably be relieved.

The fact that you’re willing to accept your wife’s infidelity for some greater political good is beyond honorable. In fact, it’s so over-the-top honorable that I’m not sure I believe your motives are real. Part of me wonders why you’re even posing this question, particularly in a column that is printed in The New York Times.

Your dilemma is intriguing, but I don’t see how it’s ambiguous. Your wife is having an affair with a person you happen to respect. Why would that last detail change the way you respond to her cheating? Do you admire this man so much that you haven’t asked your wife why she keeps having sex with him? I halfway suspect you’re writing this letter because you want specific people to read this column and deduce who is involved and what’s really going on behind closed doors (without actually addressing the conflict in person). That’s not ethical, either.

So if you are willing to tolerate your spouse screwing around to not damage a political cause (as long as that’s a leftist cause, I’m sure. This IS the NY Times), then you are to be praised – nay applauded, for your tolerance.

Also, can’t help but wonder, especially in light of the (former) Gen. Petraeus affair and subsequent resignation, well it just makes you think…”Hmmmm…”

Yeah, I realize it’s probably made-up BS, but the response? C’mon…you can’t make up leftist idiocy.

h/t Kat

Crossposted to Unified Patriots

Authored By A TowDog

Comments are closed.

SagoCom Tweets

Sago Raw

  • Four Reasons to Applaud Apple’s Tax Planning: The Senate is holding a Kangaroo Court designed to smear Apple for not voluntarily coughing up more tax revenue than the company actually owes. Here are four things you need to know. Apple is fully complying with the tax law. There is no suggestion t...
    Liberal Rhetoric 101: Teachers Should Earn More!: Liberals and "moderates" especially love to give lip-service to the idea of cutting spending, but never want to give up anything they deem REALLY, SUPER-DUPER IMPORTANT. Because if you can name something really, super-duper important, then the money...
    Terrible Tuesday: Heartache: The news out of Oklahoma is devastating. My thoughts and prayers are with the entire community of Moore, especially the victims and the first responders. God bless the teachers who shielded and comforted those children. My heart breaks for them all.
    The Dependency Agenda By Kevin D. Williamson: Reader discretion advised, book contains explicit content of a disturbing nature. This little book does not carry a warning label, but it should. It’s diminutive 5” x 7” format and 43 pages of large print belie the universe of distu...
    Gun Culture = American Culture: This is from Frank Miniter writing in Forbes read it all and then come back and we’ll talk some. When Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley (D) signed sweeping gun-control legislation into law last week he finished a mistake that is anti...
    Time to total up the DFL’s damage: With Minnesota’s 2013 legislative session in the books, it’s time to total up the DFL’s damage to Minnesota’s economy. The tax increases will hurt Minnesota’s economy the most are the business-to-business sales taxes on...